I appreciate that.
The purpose of G‑7 was to add a subparagraph, whereas the purpose NDP‑6.1 was to remove a different one. Both could hold up, meaning that one did not prevent the other. Again, I don't want to belabour the point, but I think the translations should be done in such a way that the text is identical in both languages. What I understand from the French version is that a subsection is being added and another is being removed.
The English version seems to say something else. There may be a problem when amendments are prepared or translated. I don't think that's a desirable situation. They are two different things: in one case, we are removing subparagraph (vii) and, in the other, we are adding subparagraph (viii). I understand that the numbering should have been changed, but it's a concordance, and the analysts do that very well. They don't need me or anyone else to make a decision. That said, in theory, both amendments were acceptable and could have been adopted.