Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I have the same problem with this amendment as I do with the NDP one: It doesn't define production.
We in the Bloc Québécois have read the amendment proposed by Mr. Lawton. I understand the spirit of the amendment and I share our colleague's concern. However, the term “nearly nude” is a bit problematic. It's not defined. As it happens, anyone who goes to a beach meets people who are nearly nude, people in bathing suits. You know as well as I do that bathing suits are getting smaller and smaller. It is easier and easier to think that people are nearly nude. What are we really talking about when we use the term “nearly nude”? I don't think the idea is to stop people from wearing bathing suits. It's problematic.
The amendment is too vague and opens the door too much for us to support it, although I understand the concerns of our colleague Mr. Lawton.
