Ms. Burt, I'm not sure I understood your answer. I understand that there is an attempt by the Liberal government to suggest that giving judges an out to consider every case before them to be cruel and unusual would somehow strengthen mandatory minimum penalties. I get it. I'm not sure that it would necessarily have the courts deviate from reasonable hypotheticals.
Your first answer was that the mandatory minimum penalty for accessing or possessing child pornography has been struck down. Therefore, it no longer applies. Am I correct?