In your view, this amendment would not only be redundant, but it might even be confusing, because it would seem that with the way we structured the entire section, this might still have been considered.
I find it confusing. We're saying that there would be no reason to do this anymore and you can't do this anymore, and now we're introducing the concept that you shouldn't do this anyway. I find it a bit weird.
I wanted to understand for my head that both of these things would not be part of any analysis.