Yes. Mr. Taylor just contradicted himself.
In your previous answer to my colleague Mr. Mantle, you said that, yes, the process would be that you first might challenge the constitutionality of the entire MMP, in which case the court would be able to look at a reasonable hypothetical before it got to the sentence for the individual accused. Is that correct?
They might choose an off-ramp that's available to them in proposed section 718.4, but they may not Mr. Taylor. Is that correct?