That's a really interesting one.
I'm going to talk for a second here on outraging society and decency, because in the Senneville case, in the court's eyes, to impose a one-year mandatory minimum would outrage the sense of decency in society. That was the court's decision, whereas I think a lot of Canadians here...and I'm not assailing the court's decision. I'm speaking about what I think, what I hear from constituents, which is that the striking down of that actually outraged a number of Canadians and their standards of decency.
One of the interesting things we have to look at is what is in Bill C-16 and what isn't in Bill C-16. I spent far too long dealing with sexual offences against children. One of the highlights in coming to Parliament Hill was meeting Justice Moldaver, who, for those who don't know, was on the Supreme Court of Canada until, I guess, roughly 2020, and maybe 2022 or something like that, and somebody here probably knows better. I met him and I referenced the Woodward decision on Internet luring. I could talk about this for hours.