Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I would like to propose a friendly amendment to Mr. Baber. It's a bit odd to write in a piece of legislation that reasonable hypotheticals can't be considered. I think what he's getting at is that hypothetical scenarios can't be considered. I would agree with that. I would remove the word “reasonable”. Saying that the court “shall not consider reasonable hypotheticals” is like saying that it can consider hypotheticals if they're unreasonable. That makes no sense, and it's not what we want to do. If he accepts my proposal, I'm fine with that.