Now, one of the things that are important to understand is that when we made a decision to move forward with the restoration of mandatory minimums with the residual discretion I've discussed, we did it from the point of view that we wanted to protect the mandatory minimums that exist or that a court had struck down. We did not undertake a policy exercise to analyze each of the mandatory minimums that existed at one point in time in Canada's history but that Parliament had made a decision to repeal.
By saying that the laws on the books were going to be made constitutionally compliant and that those decisions have overturned existing mandatory minimums we could restore, I think we've taken the right approach, but to answer your question, the policy work for mandatory minimums that fell outside of that scope was not part of the formulation of the bill.