I appreciate your very good play on words. I also couldn't agree more that any new law needs to be taken seriously and scrutinized, such as we're doing through this process in committee and with our witnesses for the next hour.
I have nothing against putting in an amendment about making it not retroactive. It's simply redundant and potentially risks setting a precedent for some other case or law. I don't think that it is worth putting in. Perhaps our departmental witnesses could better speak to that, but to me, it's already a law. It is not retroactive. Therefore, it would simply be redundant to put it in.
I would keep the legislation cleaner.