The bill proposes discretion between 25 and 40 years. A judge could find that 26 years would be appropriate or 27 years. It wouldn't automatically be 40 years. The difference, as my colleague indicated earlier with the Bissonnette analysis, was that in that case the court was looking at 50 years as the floor, as the starting point for the next period of parole ineligibility, so there are significant differences here with respect to the discretion and the time that the court could order the offender to serve.
