I understand that you proactively interviewed the four final candidates in terms of in-person interviews. You did enormous diligence based on their questionnaires. Did you also do heightened levels of diligence with respect to things that they may not have disclosed in the questionnaire? I'm sure they were subject to credit and criminal checks and other similar types of publicly available, open source information.
Can you assure us that, whoever would be chosen—and I'm not speaking of Chief Justice Joyal in particular—would have been screened as much as a green light committee would screen a candidate for any of our political parties?