Yes, I can. We had extensive discussions, and we decided that the two we were going to present were so exceptional, it was the decision, our consensus, that we would only nominate two. It wasn't a precedent. That was set the last time when Justice McLachlin made it clear, for the same reasons we had, that while the requirement was for three, there were really two so exceptional that they were the ones who would be best presented to the Prime Minister.
The Prime Minister, of course, as Mr. Fortin has mentioned, has the ultimate authority. He could have returned to us and said that he wanted three to five. We would then have to give it some thought, which would be very difficult for us given we had already made our choice, but that didn't happen, as you know.