In my opinion, the process works and produces excellent candidates. That's a good thing.
You also touched on another issue.
In English, the phrase is “closed doors”. The exercise that we're going through now—keep in mind that the appointment hasn't been made—is an act of public accountability and transparency in the decision-making process, which is a far cry from having the process completely finished before there's an opportunity for anyone to raise concern. I would always entertain ideas on how processes could be improved. I worry sometimes that taking things to a debate that must be adopted in the House could potentially turn what has historically been an independent process into a very political one. However, if there are other ideas, I would not suggest that the process can't be further improved.