I've also left out the chief justice of the Supreme Court of Canada.
It was to understand if they had experience working with some of the individuals and if they had characteristics that would be important for a person who could be chosen. It was not with a view to have them come up with new names to go find people in the community but instead to ensure that the choice that we're going to be making would be informed by the characteristics that those other players in the consultation process expressed. My recommendation, independent of the advisory board, would have gone to the Prime Minister, and he would have the benefit of the duality of that process.
