We rely on law enforcement agencies every day in this country to choose which matters are going to be investigated. Sometimes, even when the law suggests that a particular behaviour would be a crime, different agencies make these decisions at different times as a result of prioritization and resources. One of the advantages to the approach that we've taken is that it will empower the commissioner to take decisions that will be able to evolve over time to ensure that we don't have to wait a year or two years for a piece of legislation to pass should we wish to update the definitions in order to pursue crime that emerges as a new and modern threat in the landscape.
I'll repeat the invitation that I suggested earlier: Hear from the director of public prosecutions. Ask your questions. To the extent that you remain unsatisfied that the approach chosen is the appropriate one, this is the best forum to have those debates.