There are two that concern me the most. I don't want to see in this highly politicized environment we live in private prosecutions being laid, for example, against Zionists just for being Zionists. That's what we're going to see, efforts to weaponize sections of the Criminal Code. That could take place regardless of whether this legislation passes or not, but that's why the attorney general's consent, or the proxy that I've suggested for it, is of concern to me. The second is that, although the courts may interpret the definition of hatred as being synonymous with the Supreme Court of Canada's decision, I don't want the risk of relitigating the existing sections of the Criminal Code and potentially coming to a different result.
Those are two things I would identify.