Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I want to thank the esteemed members of the standing committee for the opportunity to speak today regarding search and rescue response times.
Again, my name is Reg Wright, and I'm the director of communications for the Gander International Airport Authority. We are a not-for-profit organization created in 1996 to manage organizations at Gander International Airport, and we play a key role in the economic and community development of the Town of Gander and the central Newfoundland region.
The airport is a source of stable, year-round employment for the region and a significant economic engine. An independent study undertaken in 2006 found that the airport directly sustains 1,200 jobs in the province, with $107 million in gross domestic product, $312 million in economic output, and $70 million in wages. Ongoing economic activity at the airport contributes $32 million annually in tax revenue, including $20.6 million to the federal government and $10.7 million to the provincial government.
I provide this background because it should be recognized that the Gander International Airport Authority--and indeed the entire central Newfoundland region--has a vested commercial and operational interest in the matters we discuss today. As a joint civilian-military airfield, the importance of CFB 9 Wing Gander and 103 Search and Rescue Squadron cannot be overstated. The military presence in Gander has long made an important and invaluable contribution to the community, historically, economically, and socially.
Gander International Airport has served military aviation since its inception. In 1938, with the threat of war rumbling in Europe, Gander fast became a strategic allied air base. Gander became the main staging point for the movement of more than 20,000 North American-built bombers to Europe during the Battle of Britain. At the height of wartime operations, as many as 15,000 British, Canadian, and American servicemen lived and worked in crowded barracks at the airport.
Even today, military aviation remains a cornerstone of our operation. While the lion's share of military traffic at Gander is from the United States and Canada, the airport also accommodates military aircraft from Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, the United Kingdom, Saudi Arabia, Israel, India, Mexico, Poland, and others. If a nation has an air force, we've seen it at Gander at one point or another, be it on a training mission, en route to an area of conflict, or providing humanitarian support.
The airport authority is fully supportive of its partners at CFB 9 Wing Gander. In particular, we share our community's pride in the work of 103 Search and Rescue Squadron. These men and women have one of the most difficult jobs on the planet, in one of the world's most difficult marine operating environments.
It is a job that demands an extraordinarily high level of courage, training, skill, and commitment. It is a job where a successful rescue mission is expected. Where a rescue mission fails, the squadron is immediately subjected to a very public discussion of what went wrong and who might be accountable. These men and women provide an essential service to people who ply a trade in a very dangerous place.
If I might convey just one thing here today, it is this: search and rescue professionals require the best possible resources and support to ensure they can continue to succeed in every mission, every day.
I guess a focal point of your work here today will involve a discussion around response times, positioning, and resources. Coming from an airport management perspective, I do not think I have the background or capacity to give great insight into this. Thankfully, a number of independent experts have already examined the greater question of SAR resources and positioning over the last decade.
Back in 2003, Dr. Norman Corbett undertook a study called “The Impact of Offshore Oil Operations on the Delivery of East Coast Search and Rescue Services”, for the Canadian Air Division Centre for Operational Research and Analysis, which may also win a record for the world's longest study report. Among other things, the study assessed whether dedicated SAR assets should be moved from Gander to St. John's and whether doing so would provide an improved response to a distress call related to the offshore oil industry.
As you know, the oil and gas industry is the crucial economic engine for the provincial economy and has witnessed great and heightened activity over the last decade. Without belabouring what is a comprehensive and complex analysis of this question, Dr. Corbett concluded--and I quote--that “coverage offered by Gander is...better than that offered by St. John's” at all distances.
While all eastern Canadian airports operate in often trying conditions, it has to be recognized that Gander does provide an inherent advantage over St. John's in terms of weather. To refer back to Dr. Corbett's report--and I quote--he indicated that: “When historical conditions are considered, Gander is the preferred location. Indeed, critical weather conditions occur more frequently in St. John's, with the most notable differences occurring in the spring and summer months”.
In terms of operating environment, weather reliability, and total critical weather conditions, Gander does provide an advantageous operating environment for search and rescue operations.
The other component of Dr. Corbett's study involved total transit and on-station times with regard to response. Again he concluded--and I quote--that a deployment from Gander generally results in faster transit times.
More recently, the National Research Council released its review of the statement of operational requirements for the fixed-wing search and rescue aircraft. This review found that basing fixed-wing assets in Gander rather than Greenwood would result in the greatest improvement in response times.
To summarize, both studies recognize that Gander, both as an airport and as a community, represents the best location for SAR resources. Beyond the weather reliability and transit times, the community and the airport have a number of other advantages: Gander International Airport is a 24/7 full-service airport with no curfews or restrictions; everything at our airport is offered 24/7, 365 days a year; the Royal Canadian Mounted Police is co-located on airport property; we are a congestion-free airport with a rate of nearly 100% direct clearances from our tower; CFB Gander is expanding its infrastructure and already has well established military supports throughout the community; and, locally, the College of the North Atlantic produces world-class aircraft maintenance engineers eager to find a career locally and contribute to the SAR endeavour.
Despite Canada’s healthy fiscal condition, we acknowledge that the Department of National Defence is under pressure to exercise financial stewardship while addressing important matters of a national and international scope.
I will say that the Gander International Airport Authority is a willing and progressive partner with DND. If an expansion or enhancement of SAR services is to take place in Gander, or new aircraft is to be added to the fleet, we can work jointly to invest in the infrastructure and operating supports to ensure this is done in the most cost-effective and efficient manner. We have made this commitment to our partner at the CFB, and I reiterate that here today. As an airport authority, we are prepared to provide whatever resources or investment is required to assist 103 in meeting its mandate.
If I can say one thing with conviction, it is that the move or dilution of current assets from Gander to any other site would serve only a niche commercial interest that stands to benefit from the same. I think exhaustive study and assessment by experts clearly demonstrate that Gander is the best choice and location for any enhancement of SAR staffing, resources, or fleeting.
So the task at hand is to determine what might be done to improve response times and mission success given changes in technology, fleeting, and marine activity. I would suggest the impossible by saying that these decisions need to be made purely on the basis of operational exemplars, that is, what is best to achieve the SAR mandate. I do recognize that it is very difficult to extract politics, lobbying, the interests of special interest groups, and capitalism from the process, but, at day’s end, I think all stakeholders and residents will be comfortable with any decision so long as it is premised on the best possible support for SAR providers and the greater community they serve.
To conclude, SAR professionals gladly undertake the challenge of one of the world’s most difficult jobs, in a dangerous North Atlantic operating environment. Our shared goal should be to support a decision that provides the enhancements and support to ensure they effectively meet their mission.
I thank you for the opportunity to present our views today and wish you every success with your hearings.