It is in line with the standard operating procedure. I helped with the writing of the standard operating procedures for NATO, and then followed on with helping with the Vancouver principles, so I'm speaking from knowledge of the information put into both of those things.
For comparison, both elements talk about the need to operationalize it and treat it differently from the women, peace and security agenda, to make sure that there are aspects of understanding, early warning, and to have a wide range of practical scenario-based training. They're in synergy with each other. The only difference is that NATO is done at the level of a NATO SOP, and what Vancouver principles is requesting is that nations take that responsibility on, nation by nation, to ensure they are already prepared before they go to pre-deployment training.