Thank you very much for that question.
The “Strategic Defence Bulletin” is arranged across five pillars. It has in totality about 162 objectives. Much as we would do it, they have established a reform committee that looks across the five pillars, that has working groups under each one of them. Much as we would do it, some of those committees are highly effective and some of them aren't.
There is a process by which we are trying to put in place metrics to say not simply what's the quantitative output, but what's the qualitative change. Getting to program management and using proper analytics is something that Canada, the United Kingdom, and other countries are trying to support the Ukrainians in putting in place. The way the Ukrainians measure it and the way we measure it from inside the defence ministry is about the same in trying to put in place those metrics.
The other measure, of course, is how the Ukrainian public feels about reform. Interestingly, in the last quarter of 2016 polling, defence reform in Ukraine was seen as one of the most visible and most positive aspects of reform. There is a sense that there is change happening for the good in the Ukrainian public, also.
From the Defence Reform Advisory Board's perspective, how are we measuring it? There are six of us. We have each taken a pillar of the “Strategic Defence Bulletin”, and we are starting to drill down very systematically now that we're a year into our work. What are the actual detailed key performance indicators that we need? Where is there change? Where do we need to focus our efforts? I won't pretend it's a science, because as you know, it's more alchemy and art, but there is a method in our madness.