Evidence of meeting #85 for National Defence in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was certainly.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

A. D. Meinzinger  Director of Staff, Strategic Joint Staff, Department of National Defence
Derek Joyce  Director General, International Security Policy, Department of National Defence
William Seymour  Chief of Staff Operations, Canadian Joint Operations Command, Department of National Defence

MGen A. D. Meinzinger

I'm not an expert, but I know NATO has NATO-Russia consultations, which is dialogue. You probably were briefed on that when you were over at NATO headquarters. Things such as exercises, like a large-scale Russian exercise on the edge of the Baltics, for some would be seen as very provocative. Briefing that activity out in that kind of dialogue is a way to simmer down the tensions and the provocations that some may read from it.

Randall Garrison NDP Esquimalt—Saanich—Sooke, BC

I guess more directly, then, I would ask, has Canada really been involved in the disarmament committee of NATO, and have you been asked to have input into activities more directly that might lead to that?

I accept that Operation Reassurance is a deterrent. In our party, we supported it on that basis, but what's happening on the other side of that? Is NATO really active, and is Canada active in trying to reduce nuclear weapons and reduce those tensions?

MGen Derek Joyce

I can say that NATO is committed to creating the conditions for a world without nuclear weapons, and that's stated.

Canada, along with co-sponsors Germany and the Netherlands—not necessarily within the NATO context—is promoting the work of the fissile material cut-off treaty, and that's really all I would have to say on that.

The Chair Liberal Stephen Fuhr

Mr. Gerretsen.

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

I want to ask a couple of questions regarding the AWACS program that Canada has recently announced it will get involved with again in NATO.

I'm not sure who would like to answer this, so I'll turn it to any of you. Could you comment on what that contribution means to NATO and how important it is for Canada to play a role in AWACS?

MGen Derek Joyce

Sure, I'd be happy to.

From the NATO perspective, it's going to be Canada's contribution to the support and operations of the AWACS program to the tune of $17 million to $20 million, I think. We're still in the negotiations of exactly how much that will be.

It is a fair-share contribution from Canadians' perspective to a NATO program that we haven't participated in for a while. So I think—

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

I just want to interject there for a quick second.

Do you recall why we chose to get out of participating in it?

MGen Derek Joyce

Yes, certainly. It was during a time of fiscal restraint, and the Government of Canada was looking for areas to cut programs that were not viewed as being productive.

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

Why was it not viewed as being productive?

MGen Derek Joyce

At the time, around the 2010 period, there had been a couple of requests for the use of NATO AWACS, for example, for the 2010 Vancouver Olympics and in support of operations in Afghanistan. The NATO system was complex enough that it was not able to provide those capabilities when Canada asked, and so as a result of that, the view was that it wasn't a performing program from Canadians' perspective.

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

To help us during the Olympics?

MGen Derek Joyce

That's correct, yes, to bring the AWACS over to help control the air security situation. As a result of that, the decision was then made to cease the program, to a savings of about $60 million.

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

Now that we're back in the program, what's the response from our allies in NATO?

MGen Derek Joyce

I think the key response is that it's great to have additional funding, but I think more importantly, it's important to have Canada as an ally in the AWACS program. The centre of gravity of NATO is coming together as an alliance, as alliance cohesion, and this is one additional contributor to that cohesion, having all members of NATO contributing to this program.

MGen A. D. Meinzinger

I'll add that we're certainly seeing the benefit. The NATO AWACS will operate overhead our troops in Latvia by, but one example, operating, as I mentioned earlier, overhead the airspace of Iraq, so we're accruing a benefit on the ground, and I think in the policy recently released, we talk about the JISR, joint intelligence surveillance reconnaissance, the priority of that capacity in the future operating environment being kind of a premium, so we see the AWACS playing a greater role in that regard.

MGen Derek Joyce

I'd like to just add that the process for requesting AWACS support from NATO has changed, so the challenges that we had eight years ago have been mitigated.

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

So if we ask them to come, the response might be different, may have been different under this new protocol.

MGen Derek Joyce

That's correct.

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

I don't know if there's any more time, but I'm happy to share.

The Chair Liberal Stephen Fuhr

You have about a minute for a question and answer.

Leona Alleslev Liberal Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill, ON

I have a quick question. When we were at RMC, we didn't have the opportunity to participate in a mock NATO. Would you happen to know if they can today? It's pretty cool. Do we get invited to Carleton or...?

MGen A. D. Meinzinger

When you're the commandant of an incredible institution—

Leona Alleslev Liberal Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill, ON

Some of us didn't play hockey. We were doing history stuff.

Voices

Oh, oh!

MGen A. D. Meinzinger

One of the benefits of being the commandant is that you get to see the wonderful work and efforts of the youth of our country.

In fact, RMC has been sending a model NATO team to a competition somewhere in New York. I apologize, but I can't remember what town. As I recall, that team won that competition five or six times consecutively. As General Joyce described, it's four days with no sleep and trying to build consensus with small teams. For some reason, our cadets—our youth, our members—have those skills. Probably because it's just the way they approach problems, they were able to win that competition.