Something to that effect exists within most NATO countries. It applies to different degrees depending on the countries that have obligatory service versus voluntary militaries. Ultimately, most defence forces.... And it's not for mental illness, it's for physical illness. It is for other things. The concept is always in review. It's always under scrutiny, within Canada, in the sense of is it the same to be deploying to a large base like Kandahar, where you have a hospital, as to a small village in Sierra Leone? We talk about this.
I will take advantage of saying to you that we have been taking a very progressive view as we've gone further with mental illness. We're really emphasizing more and more. I sit quarterly with my colleagues who are helping to make the decisions of actually looking at people's functioning more than their diagnoses. We look to see... if somebody has had three depressions, but they've only missed three or four days of work here and there, and they've been able to sail and they've been able function, we're not saying, “You can't serve in the military because you have this illness.” If they are functioning, and able to continue to do their jobs safely, we are encouraging, and the military is responsive to, accepting a little bit more risk when it comes to illness if somebody is able to function with treatment.