I think Mr. May mentioned this earlier, and it was certainly mentioned by other witnesses. We talked about the universality of service. When we think of it, National Defence has the largest intelligence component in all of the apparatus of national security intelligence in our country, and not everybody in that particular realm is a regular forces warrior-mentality individual.
I'm wondering about this. If we're talking about cybersecurity and the need for cybersecurity, and then all the cyber/digital world that we're facing, would it not seem logical that there would be some serious relaxation of the universality of service? Even specific to certain career paths—there are 105 career paths, we've been told, or somewhere around that, within the armed forces—would it not make sense that we're trying to recruit the best people for these positions? Can latitude not be exercised in some of these?