I think it does so in a very roundabout sort of way. The fact that you have a defence industrial strategy before you have a national security strategy illustrates that. It talks about some of these areas, such as drones and all of that, and it highlights some of the tasks.
If I can make a comparison, I would look at either the United Kingdom's or the United States' 2024 defence industrial strategy. They make it very clear what tasks need to be done, what industry has to provide and the ways to do so. If you compare those documents to our document, they are very different. A clear identification is made of what those requirements are for the future warfighting effort or the future provision of security.
That's not what this document is. Clearly, this is a first step, to some degree. If you talk to many senior officials, I think they will admit that the future ones may have that, but the current document does not. It does so in a very indirect manner.