Thank you, Mr. Chair.
On June 9, 2009, the Standing Committee on Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development heard from Neil McCrank. He came before the committee as an individual. The report he presented suggested steps for simplifying regulations, especially in order to facilitate obtaining an operating licence.
Mr. McCrank also recommended—and this is important for my questions that will follow—that the MacKenzie Valley Land and Water Board be the sole authority in charge of decisions. According to him, that would put an end to there being different regional boards, including those in Sahtu, Wek'eezhii and Gwich'in.
In the 2009 annual report by the Mining Association of Canada, the section on the diamond committee says the following:In October 2009 Minister Chuck Strahl referred to the creation of the new Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency (CanNor) and the Northern Projects Management Office as the department’s main initiatives so far. However, as important as these new agencies are, neither has the mandate or the resources to implement the major components of the McCrank report.
It can therefore be concluded that the Canadian Mining Association would go ahead with that recommendation.
However, several aboriginal chiefs spoke out against the idea of restructuring proposed in the report. They pointed out that land and water boards in Sahtu, Wek'eezhii and Gwich'in, in the Northwest Territories, are protected by land claims agreements, so as to ensure that aboriginals can keep control of their land.
Mr. Gratton, does your association worry that this disagreement with aboriginals will cause problems? Could those problems affect mining projects?
Mr. Hart, what would be the potential consequences of those agreement problems between the organizations and the aboriginal groups?