Mr. Chair, in looking at member Simard's amendment, it's significantly different from the substantive motion that was put forward by Mr. Patzer. I would ask for the clerk or for you to make a determination—since the rules are that a substantive motion requires 48 hours' notice—if this amendment is indeed such a substantive motion.
It is a substantive motion on its own, and I would argue that it is not a true amendment. Since there was no 48 hours' notice, I would ask for you to rule this so-called amendment out of order, as not really an amendment but as a substantive motion on its own.