I believe there will always be Francophones from Quebec and from abroad who are attracted to British Columbia, just there are large numbers of Francophones who are attracted by the climate and the job opportunities in California. We discussed that this morning. That is fine. That is great if they are fulfilling their own goals. However, if we want to invest in something which will, in the medium and long terms, strengthen French in Canada, a well-advised orientation policy for Allophone immigrants to Canada—I repeat—should point them in the direction of Quebec City, Montreal, Gatineau, Ottawa, Moncton or Sudbury—basically, to the bilingual belt and Quebec.
As for Francophones living in other areas, there is no reason why we could not develop a policy to support their cultural vitality, such as theatre, tours of authors-composers-performers, literature, and so on—something I hope would also be available to Francophones in California, Los Angeles, New York or Chicago. They are part of significant Francophone communities and are also potential consumers of French-language cultural products from Canada, and which are available in greater numbers than in Vancouver.
So, what we need is a nuanced policy, not a “flattened” one.