Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I am very happy that you are here today. Manitoba feels a bit like home to me. My father grew up there; he attended a French school in Saint-Norbert and studied at the Collège universitaire de Saint-Boniface. He told me stories about his philosophy and Greek exams when the school was still a classical college. I fully understand the challenge that comes with studying in French in a place like Manitoba, but I feel that you are up to the challenge.
I would first like to briefly clarify my comments, given that we will not talk a lot about this topic. In terms of Katimavik, it was $28,000 a year per participant and the drop-out rate was 30%. I really share your point of view on the importance of authentic experiences. Immersion is important, but you need more than that. That has been my experience as well. I have met with young students who were in immersion for years, but who did not acquire the confidence to use their French-language skills in the community and in the world in general. In that sense, authentic experiences are important.
You also talked about history. And that is always problematic, especially when we talk about the teaching of history by the federal government. The provinces are sometimes sensitive to the issue. I would like us to talk about authentic experiences in today's context. I think it is a good topic and we could talk about it in broader terms in committee.
Could you give us some examples of authentic experiences or tell us about your ideas in a more current context rather than historical? I actually think that students are more interested in the present than in the past. History is important, but it does not always awaken the same interest.