Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Ms. Brouillette, you did a good job summarizing the four areas of intervention in the realm of immigration—namely, promotion, recruitment, intake and integration. I added the question of retention to that.
Several witnesses came to talk to us about promotion. They talked about minority francophone communities, and how to attract francophone immigrants to them. According to these witnesses, the promotion being done in this area outside Canada simply doesn't succeed in communicating to the rest of the world that there's a living, vibrant language in Canada called French. I'd like to hear your comments on this subject.
With respect to recruitment, I will share the negative comments we heard, such as comments on the French test that people must pass outside Canada. I won't revisit that, but let's just as that the situation is already problematic from the start.
With respect to intake, community organizations in minority communities have said they don't have sufficient funds to adequately welcome the people into the community. Often, the larger and possibly better-organized agencies say they can offer bilingual service. But they're not referring to a francophone window, and to services offered by francophones, for francophones. Lastly, with respect to integration and retention, we are told retention is already a problem. In fact, Mr. Généreux alluded to the problem indirectly.
I'd like to know what we've done best, how the federal government could help you improve the situation, and in which fields the government, in your association's view, is less effective.