I know you are promoting awareness. I cited the example of duality, and I told you how well that is working in New Brunswick.
After 200 years of anglophones and francophones living together, we came to the conclusion that we could not preserve the social fabric except by having a duality, that is to say a francophone leader who thinks for the francophone minority and an anglophone leader who does the same for the anglophone majority. That was the purpose of my question. I am not talking about giving the department more money, but about creating an independent secretariat with a leader who thinks in terms of getting things done "by and for" the minorities in majority settings.
I am also thinking of the anglophone minorities in Quebec. Organizations that represent them came and testified before us. They have the same problem as I do in New Brunswick, outside Quebec. That is what I am asking. Do you think it would be more effective if an independent secretariat like that dealt with minorities living in majority settings?
It is impossible to manage 600 integration organizations and all the departments. As my colleague Mr. Généreux told me, his business would not do well if he had to manage that many organizations. He would have to shut down before the end of the year. I am talking about efficiency and achieving objectives, what the act requires you to do.