You said that we should go back to an annual review. It is important to understand that the small departments, the departments that do well and the departments that have the least impact conduct a review every three years. There are still some large, high-impact departments that carry out annual reviews. So we must make a distinction.
The Auditor General has looked into this issue. He told us that it was a good approach to manage the risks and to ensure that the assessments are relevant and provided in time.
We feel that our approach is not bad. We have not established a clear guideline requiring that reviews be conducted every three years in all cases. That's not true. The more at-risk groups have to do annual reviews. In those cases, we like to have the data.