Mr. Chair, I want to assure my colleague that the position taken by the government with respect to my honourable colleague's private member's bill was supported by a legal opinion that was thoroughly researched, reflecting upon the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in the Nadon reference.
In that decision, the Supreme Court held unequivocally that changing the composition of the court, particularly and explicitly as it relates to the eligibility criteria, is the main reason why we were not able to support my colleague's private member's initiative.