Thank you, Mr. Chair.
To answer my colleague's question on the issue that anglophone groups have brought up with him, I would point out that right now, the English language is thriving while the French language is in decline. When it comes to the language of work, it's quite obvious that English is largely predominant. Thus, the French language needs support.
Under normal circumstances, all opposition parties would have been onside on applying Bill 101 to federally regulated private businesses. However, the Liberals did not support this. The UFPBA was somewhat the way to prevent the government of Quebec from applying Bill 101 to federally regulated businesses.
Ms. Boily, there are two conflicting regimes now. By the way, I'm not asking you to take a stand, because that's not your role.
As I understand it, businesses that are subject to Bill 101 did not have other options, because the new Bill 101 applies to all businesses throughout Quebec, with the exception of those covered by the UFPBA. However, now, businesses that had started the francization process can choose to withdraw from the Charter of the French Language and to submit to the UFPBA. The briefing note states that around 40% of federally regulated private businesses in Quebec have not yet registered under the Charter of the French Language. These businesses will be automatically registered under the UFPBA.
Is that correct?