I think you've hit on most of the major concerns we would have and that we've discussed in the past, beginning with the “Time for Action” report in 2001, and it is issues around the length of time and the complexity of the evidence. These cases can become emotionally charged for everyone involved in the process: for the parties themselves, for the counsels who are acting for the parties, and for the tribunal members hearing those cases. They can be very difficult. There are those issues that we all face in dealing with them. We believe the proactive model would ensure a more timely and a less litigious adversarial approach to resolving these issues that would be in everyone's best interest. Not only have you heard about the length of some of these cases and the complexity, but also the situations where there have been large retroactive payments that employers need to deal with at the end of the day. That's not in their best interest either. The proactive model would make that different, and it would not make it as difficult on the employer and the employees.
