In fact, I was going to say the same as Paul.
I noticed by reading all the hearings and the experts, etc., that there is some confusion. As it was mentioned today, the wage gap is due to many different causes, which are discriminatory but it's not wage discrimination. Each part of this wage gap, whether education or experience or family and work conciliation, may be closed by different types of policies.
However, pay equity is a different policy that deals only with the wage discrimination and not the wage gap. Employers can be afraid of thinking that the wage gap, which is 20%, will have to be compensated by them, but it's not true. The adjustments are around 5% or 6%, depending on the jobs. I think it is extremely important to be very clear about this.
When the Pay Equity Act was passed in Quebec, this act was initiated by a different party from the one that was the government at the time, which was the Liberal Party. The premier was away for a mission and asked that the passing of the act wait for one day until he came back. At the beginning, he wasn't in favour of this Pay Equity Act that was presented by a different party. However, he wanted to manifest his support to pay equity, and the act was passed with the unanimity of all the parties in the National Assembly of Quebec.
I wish that it would be the same at the federal level, if I can wish for something like that.
Thank you very much.