I'll start by giving you the details of the recommendations, if that's helpful. For five recommendations, we deemed that the follow-up was unsatisfactory. We did a follow-up audit on two of these recommendations that had to do with internal controls over financial reporting. That was in our 2013 fall report, and it was following up on recommendations we had made in 2011, during the audit on internal controls over financial reporting. In two of our recommendations from that, we deemed that the activities of the organizations involved were not satisfactory.
The same report, the 2013 fall report, had a chapter on preventing illegal entry into Canada. In that, we followed up on a recommendation we had made in an audit in 2007, the follow-up to which we had deemed unsatisfactory. That was a recommendation to CBSA about improving the results of their monitoring of the lookouts they had put in place at the border.
Also in the 2013 fall report of the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development, there was a follow-up on two recommendations we had made in 2005 related to the ecological integrity of national parks. Again, these were all recommendations contained in audit reports that we had presented to Parliament. Sometimes we do a complete follow-up, so we look at all of the recommendations we have made in the past and we do a complete follow-up to say whether or not the progress was satisfactory. Sometimes we do an audit in a similar area, so we may pick one recommendation from the past.
We do those audits when we expect the organization has had enough time to carry out the actions they said they were going to. In this case, they had carried out only 50% of them, and we deemed that to be unsatisfactory and reported that assessment to Parliament.