Thank you.
We felt it was an important case study for everyone to understand what happened. There was the plan to reduce the cost of providing the email services. The plan was to produce $56-million worth of savings. The fact that the $56 million was taken out of the budget before the transformation was completed was exactly the issue we wanted to put in front of Parliament, because we knew it would have an impact on the organization. Taking out the $56 million before the savings were generated meant that the organization would have to react to that in some other ways. I think we've just heard that, in the organization's opinion, the result has been delays in all of the other projects.
We have presented it simply as illustrative, so that people can understand the importance of making sure that the budget is following what is actually happening rather than the other way around. When budgets are reduced before activities have been completed that should produce those savings, it's going to have a sort of fallout effect on other parts of an organization. I think we've heard that today.