Generally, I think the way that you've characterized a lot of it is right, from a factual point of view at least.
What we now have is an order in council that would allow us to get access to the budget documents that we asked for after November 2015. What we were looking for was analysis and some of that analysis would have been done before November 2015. That order in council would not cover that, as you said.
Even getting access to the analysis that was done after November 2015—which the order in council would give us the right to do, but which we have not yet asked for, so we haven't received any of that information—wouldn't allow us to come back and tell you whether, throughout the course of all of these tax measures, Finance Canada did all of the analysis that they should have done. I think it's important to remember that.
As I said in my opening statement, I consider the most recent order in council to be a good step and hopefully it shows the willingness on the part of the government to continue to work with us to find a lasting solution, but the order in council isn't sufficient. It isn't going to solve the problem, in the long term, because again, it is the same type of approach to fixing the problem as we've seen before and those types of solutions tend to work for a while, but then another problem crops up.
We need to get to a better solution. Hopefully, the order in council is a signal from the government that we will be able to work with them to get to that long-lasting solution.