Mr. Chair, we didn't do it in this specific case. It's always difficult to do because we can't audit the numbers of any other country we are comparable to. The best that we would be able to do on a lot of these things would be to try to determine whether another country is reporting numbers in a similar fashion, and then we have to be able to determine whether we could rely on it.
Again, I would give the example of our going through the 19 million records of vehicles that came across the border and identifying the anomalies in the database. That's not the type of information that we're going to see other countries reporting—and even at that, it was the function of the audit that identified that sort of problem in the way the information was being captured.
Overall, while the comment made earlier was that the results were not bad, what we were looking at here is a critically important area. I think when I look at this audit overall, I'm very concerned about the results that we found, including the missed lookouts or there not being an appropriate rationale for issuing temporary resident permits, or the 300,000 vehicles coming across the border, or not having all the mandatory training done. I'm very concerned about all of those things.
I think the good part of this is that every one of the things we found is fixable, and fixable fairly quickly. The departments can look at the types of information we looked at and can give you updates, and we've already seen progress on mandatory training. It's difficult for us to make that comparison with other jurisdictions.
I think the issues that we identified, including the instances of controls not being followed, are very concerning, as opposed to a lot of different audits where we will come here and report problems that, quite frankly, are very difficult to fix. In this case there are a number of issues we've identified that can be fixed very quickly, and some probably already have.