Mr. Chair, I just want to make sure that people are clear on why we identified this.
For us, we felt it was something that the department needed to look at in case it indicated whether their original decision—that a job needed to be filled and therefore a temporary foreign worker needed to be brought in—was the right decision in the first place. If you bring in a temporary foreign worker and then you have to lay off that temporary foreign worker, does that indicate that there was not a job there in the first place or a job that was going to last?
That's the issue we're trying to get at. When there is that indication that the job was not going to last as long as it was originally intended, then is there something to learn from that in terms of how decisions are made in approving the temporary foreign worker positions in the first place?