Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
I want to thank the witnesses for being present with us today on what is a terrible instance, I think, of a combination of issues, some being of oversight, accountability, particularly by CBSA.
I note that some of you have read the report. Hopefully, you have all read it. It suggests there was a lack of information and documentation provided to the Auditor General, but that, just within CBSA itself, there was an inability for them to second the documents for the Auditor General to review.
In some of the testimony made in response to some of my colleagues' questions, in particular, Microsoft, for example, responded with the fact that the numbers, the financial invoices, where the money went and how they were accounting for some of those services were different from what the Auditor General found. I wouldn't dispute the Auditor General's finding, because it's obvious that she put a number associated with this work.
However, I would judge—or try to judge, at least—where those invoices came from. It may be the fact that these invoices were billed through GC Strategies, particularly with the work that you've done, and they may have failed to report to the government the true cost.
Is that a potential in any of your minds?