Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you, Ms. Morgan, for being with us today.
In the interest of clearing up some obvious confusion here for anyone watching at home, I would just like to read something into the record.
This is what McCarthy wrote on its website on December 1, 2023, when it launched its review:
SDTC has agreed that, to facilitate the review, any employee or former employee can speak freely to McCarthy Tétrault without fear of reprisal and without being considered as violating any applicable settlement agreements or non-disclosure agreements.
In the public record on the ISED website, anyone can see McCarthy's fact-finding review. It states:
McCarthy prepared a consent form for current and former employees which permitted the disclosure, use and collection of personal information in a manner consistent with the Review and law. This consent form was not mandatory for participation.
McCarthy also prepared a waiver form to encourage participation by releasing participants from any specific confidentiality obligations owed to SDTC. This waiver form was not mandatory for participation.
I just want to get that on the record, because there's been a lot of back-and-forth and confusion on this.
Returning to your opening statement, you referred to the third party reviews that are currently in place for the last requirement and how they're overseen by the board. What does your oversight as a board entail with these organizations conducting the reviews?