Ms. O'Gorman, in relation to a question put to you by my Liberal colleagues, you said that whoever picked GC Strategies is still an unknown entity and that, for well over a year, it has been just hanging in the air. I guess you forgot about ATIP request A-2022-27196, which asked for summary request records from November 1 to November 16 of notes, emails and texts sent or received by Erin O'Gorman, Ted Gallivan, Jonathan Moor and Kelly Belanger related to either the ArriveCAN app or their November 14, 2022 appearance at the government operations committee, including any discussions following the meeting.
Based on that response, you as president and vice-presidents Minh Doan and Kelly Belanger approved a briefing preparatory package that provides—wait for it—a direct response to the question of who chose GC Strategies for ArriveCAN. Lo and behold, in annex A of the ATIP as supplied by someone in your department, presumably you, in answer to the question “Who made the decision to contract GC Strategies?”, it states:
My office made the decision to pursue the contract with GC Strategies.
The two proposals for the work were presented to the CIO and President, and the decision was made to proceed with GC Strategies as their proposal and approach aligned best to what the CBSA was looking for, particularly rapid staff augmentation.
The Deloitte proposal was a managed service using their Cloud instance. This would have involved additional risk, and did not align with our direction to build Cloud/Mobile competencies within the Agency.
Why are you lying to committee?