Two things. If in fact the payment is due because the person has been victimized, then maybe one of the mechanisms you could look at is requiring that the state, whoever the state actor is who has violated the rights, has a surcharge. I think the concern about victims' surcharge is there. So when we're actually talking about someone who has been victimized by the state, maybe there's a way to have a surcharge that's applied to the actor who owes that money as well. That's one thing.
When you're talking about totem poles, the reference to totem poles, a common misunderstanding is that the person lowest on the totem pole is actually the least important. In fact it's the opposite. So the most significant on the totem pole is that person at the base.