Evidence of meeting #68 for Public Safety and National Security in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was waters.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Liberal
Director General, Traveller Programs Directorate, Canada Border Services Agency
In this case, it's the same thing as for vehicles, like cars, that enter Canada.
Liberal
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Rob Oliphant
Are you done?
It's always like this with lawyers.
Are there other questions before we conclude?
We thank our witnesses. You're very welcome to stay through our clause-by-clause consideration of the bill.
Conservative
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Rob Oliphant
We are. We're a little early. We have 10 more minutes, but I think we can start our clause-by-clause consideration if all of you agree.
Conservative
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Rob Oliphant
I'm not understanding. It's clause-by-clause consideration on this bill, Bill S-233. That's what we're doing.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Rob Oliphant
We're going to do that. Luckily you're dealing with a committee that is very experienced at clause-by-clause. They're very effective at it. Also, as we begin our clause-by-clause, Justin is with me. He is our procedural clerk who does legislation. He's here to make sure that I don't make mistakes.
We'll go to the clause-by-clause consideration of Bill S-233.
Pursuant to Standing Order 75(1), we will postpone consideration of the short title, which is clause 1, and move to clause 2 of the bill.
(Clauses 2 and 3 agreed to)
(On clause 4)
On clause 4, are there questions or concerns?
Conservative
Dianne Lynn Watts Conservative South Surrey—White Rock, BC
I'm wondering if they have enough resources in terms of implementing this.... Never mind. That's okay. I'm good.
Conservative
Liberal
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Rob Oliphant
It is part of clause 7, I believe.
(Clauses 5 and 6 agreed to)
(On clause 7)
Liberal
John Oliver Liberal Oakville, ON
Proposed paragraph 95(1.1)(a) has an extra “as”. I don't know if that's a committee detail or whether that's corrected later. It reads “as long as as”. I don't know if that's committee work or clerk's work.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Rob Oliphant
That is in line 17 on page 4 in the English version. It is correct in French.
I will ask the officials if they would like to strike “as”. Is there any drafting reason why you want it? There's just an extra “as”.
Director General, Traveller Programs Directorate, Canada Border Services Agency
It's just an accident.
Liberal
