No. You have said that several times.
When the parole hearing was held on September 22, you said in your first remarks that they categorically rejected that aspect of the plan. What you said subsequent to that was that they did not support that. It was a much more ambiguous statement. The ambiguous statement was presented to the House of Commons. The quote from the board suggested that they didn't reapprove, that they expected a better recommendation in the future. That seems to be a bit of a nuance.
Let me ask you this: When that parole hearing was held and that decision was made, were you made aware that your correctional officers were recommending that rehabilitation, that this was part of the rehabilitation plan? Did you become aware of it then?