I appreciate the response, but that's not really what I was asking. I'm asking whether this is going to be a point of confusion for manufacturers potentially—I don't know if it will or not—or firearm owners, because it doesn't apply to firearms that exist on the market today and that are in the possession of lawful gun owners today. It applies to only those that will be manufactured at some point down the road, which Canadians would buy.
Again, it may be a question that doesn't really have any impact, but I'm still curious and I want to ensure that the specifications you refer to here are not confusing and that they don't cause, as some of my colleagues around the table have suggested, the manufacturers to perhaps be prone—and I disagree with the assertion—to potentially circumventing the law and the rules around the manufacture of firearms.
Are you comfortable that this definition will clarify any confusion that the manufacturers would have?