Evidence of meeting #8 for Public Safety and National Security in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was chair.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Wassim Bouanani
Evelyn Fox  Founder, Communities for Zero Violence
Richard Miller  Founder, Keep6ix
Heidi Rathjen  Coordinator, PolySeSouvient
Wendy Cukier  President, Coalition for Gun Control
Marcell Wilson  Founder, One By One Movement Inc.
Boufeldja Benabdallah  Spokesman, Centre culturel islamique de Québec

12:20 p.m.

The Clerk

Mr. Chair, in the room, we have Mr. Melillo.

12:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Jim Carr

Go ahead, Mr. Melillo.

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

Eric Melillo Conservative Kenora, ON

Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.

We have a few folks who want to speak to this, so I would actually echo Mr. McKinnon's point of order and say that it would be time to allow our witnesses to leave and thank them for their testimony.

I do want to speak to the amendment that Mr. Lloyd has put forward. I think it's very important. Obviously the government is moving forward with an unprecedented action that we're seeing right now and it would be of great benefit to this committee to have additional opportunity for accountability and looking at what the role is going to be for the OPP in Windsor and in Ottawa and what we're seeing across the province.

I'm in favour of the motion that the NDP has put forward, but I believe the amendment Mr. Lloyd is suggesting is incredibly reasonable and very important right now, given the circumstances.

12:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Jim Carr

Are there other hands up in the room?

12:20 p.m.

The Clerk

Mr. Van Popta, and then Mr. Shipley.

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

Tako Van Popta Conservative Langley—Aldergrove, BC

That's good. Thank you.

12:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Jim Carr

Sorry. I'm going to make the decision to thank our witnesses. There just won't be any more time left. I regret that, but those are the rules that constrain us all.

Witnesses, thank you very much for your insight. It has been very emotional, very important and very impactful, so thank you very much for that.

Now let's move to the hands up in the room.

Clerk, go with those that you see, please.

12:20 p.m.

The Clerk

Mr. Van Popta.

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

Tako Van Popta Conservative Langley—Aldergrove, BC

Thank you, Clerk; and thank you, Mr. Chair.

I want to speak in favour of the amendment that the OPP be added to the study. It's very important for this public safety committee to come to an understanding of how we got to this point where our government made the unprecedented decision to invoke the Emergencies Act. I want to hear from the various police forces involved here, particularly in the province of Ontario, about how we came to that point. To what extent were the OPP and the RCMP and the city police working together, and the CBSA, who are also part of this study, and how could we improve that? What could have been done better?

It's really important for us to come to a better understanding of that issue in particular, but also how we came to this point where the government has decided to call it an emergency and take these unprecedented steps.

Thank you.

12:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Jim Carr

Thank you.

Clerk, are there other hands up in the room?

12:20 p.m.

The Clerk

Yes, Mr. Chair. Mr. Shipley is next.

12:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Jim Carr

Mr. Shipley, go ahead.

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

Doug Shipley Conservative Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte, ON

Thank you, Chair. I'll be supporting wholeheartedly this amendment put forward by my colleague Mr. Lloyd. The OPP would be a great service to add to this discussion that we've been having. They are the largest police service in Ontario. A lot of these incidents that have happened over the last few weeks have been in Ontario and it would be hugely remiss of us not include them in our study.

They also would bring a lot of background information from different and past incidents that might help us to figure out how we got here today, and they might have some insights on what could have been done better and moving forward.

I definitely would agree with the amendment of adding the OPP. It would be very important to have them here. They are a large service, doing the entire province of Ontario and bringing a wealth of information, both from current and past events. I definitely support bringing them to some studies on this and I look forward to meeting them, so I'll be supporting that amendment.

12:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Jim Carr

Thank you.

Mr. McKinnon, do I see your hand up?

12:20 p.m.

Liberal

Ron McKinnon Liberal Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam, BC

Yes. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

I'm very interested in hearing from the OPP. I think they have a very useful perspective on this, so I will support that amendment. However, I go back to the fundamental problem I have with doing it at this time. Because it is an ongoing matter, people are not going to be able to speak freely to it at this time.

I want to comment further on Mr. Van Popta's remarks about the need to examine how we got to this point. I think that's also a very important question. However, that is precisely the role of the parliamentary committee that we are required to create as a consequence of invoking the Emergencies Act. A parliamentary committee must be struck to examine and consider the aspects that Mr. Van Popta brought forward.

I will support the amendment, but ultimately I will not support the motion.

12:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Jim Carr

Are there any other hands up, or can we go to a vote?

12:25 p.m.

The Clerk

Yes, Mr. Chair. Madame Michaud is next.

12:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Jim Carr

Madame Michaud, go ahead.

12:25 p.m.

Bloc

Kristina Michaud Bloc Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia, QC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

I will be brief. I think that this is an interesting addition to the study, given that Ontario Provincial Police officers have been on the front lines since the beginning of this crisis. I am therefore in favour of this amendment.

12:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Jim Carr

Are there other hands up?

12:25 p.m.

The Clerk

We have Mr. Chiang.

12:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Jim Carr

Mr. Chiang, go ahead.

12:25 p.m.

Liberal

Paul Chiang Liberal Markham—Unionville, ON

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

In my experience as a police officer in the past, the police will not be able to speak much about the operational issues and what's happening right now because it's an ongoing operation and an ongoing situation in Canada. My experience is that they will give us the bare bones of what they are doing.

I support the motion about having the OPP join us on this thing, but in terms of the police talking about stuff.... After every operation, they do an after-action report to see where they fell short, what they did wrong and what they did right. Once that report is completed, they will be able to talk to us more about what they did and what they didn't do properly. My suggestion is to delay it. That would be best, instead of calling them right now to come in to testify.

12:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Jim Carr

Mr. Clerk, are there any other hands up in the room? I don't see any on the screen.

12:25 p.m.

The Clerk

Yes. We have Mr. Van Popta.