I know we have a “review of specified activities” section in the act. I don't remember the definition of those. I didn't look at the definition of a "specified activity".
I want to ask the officials something first. Do you have a challenge with the way amendment NDP-17 is currently worded? Is there a problem?
Even if, as Ms. Michaud suggested, you changed the wording to list a third party, would that change the concerns that could be related to the broadening of this to include other organizations, third parties that could come in and start questioning the specified activities of the two agencies?