Thanks for the question. I have a good answer. That's why I didn't take the off-ramp.
Bill C-30 proposed an administrative scheme for subscriber information. There was no requirement for judicial oversight. It was scaled back for that reason. There were other checks and balances that were built into that legislation. It was not enacted.
Since we have to go before a judge now with a production order and the judge has the discretion for granting the order or not for the subscriber information, the decision was made that this was the check and balance against that. That's why it was expanded.