Evidence of meeting #17 for Status of Women in the 39th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was departments.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Hélène Dwyer-Renaud  Director, Gender-Based Analysis, Status of Women Canada
Michèle Bougie  Senior Policy and Program Analyst, Status of Women Canada

Nicole Demers Bloc Laval, QC

Aboriginal women's shelters in the Aboriginal communities currently have only $90,000 a year to meet their needs, whereas battered women's shelters in Quebec have $300,000 a year. We consider the problems of Aboriginal women even more significant. In the Aboriginal communities where there are shelters, it's even more difficult because women no longer go to the shelters anonymously. They therefore need additional resources to meet the needs of women who seek their help and assistance.

10:50 a.m.

Conservative

Bruce Stanton Conservative Simcoe North, ON

All right, I understand.

I'll wrap up with that, and I'll go to Madam Davidson.

The Chair Liberal Yasmin Ratansi

Ms. Davidson.

10:50 a.m.

Conservative

Patricia Davidson Conservative Sarnia—Lambton, ON

Thank you, Madam Chair.

I'd like to ask Madame Demers if it would be possible to split her motion and vote individually on the individual points.

Nicole Demers Bloc Laval, QC

You're suggesting we split it in two?

10:50 a.m.

Conservative

Patricia Davidson Conservative Sarnia—Lambton, ON

Pardon me?

Nicole Demers Bloc Laval, QC

The first two concern Aboriginal women's shelters.

It doesn't bother me at all to split the motion in two parts and vote on them individually.

10:50 a.m.

Conservative

Patricia Davidson Conservative Sarnia—Lambton, ON

Thank you very much. I'd appreciate that.

The Chair Liberal Yasmin Ratansi

Ms. Neville, and then Madame Boucher.

Anita Neville Liberal Winnipeg South Centre, MB

Further to my comments earlier, Madam Chair, and particularly if we're splitting the motion in two, I would ask Madame Demers if she would include in the motion, for one, that “the Standing Committee on the Status of Women call upon the Minister for the Status of Women and the Minister of Indian Affairs”.

The Chair Liberal Yasmin Ratansi

Agreeable?

Nicole Demers Bloc Laval, QC

Absolutely, Madam Chair.

The Chair Liberal Yasmin Ratansi

Madame Boucher.

10:50 a.m.

Conservative

Sylvie Boucher Conservative Beauport—Limoilou, QC

I have a question for Ms. Demers.

You said $90,000 and $300,000 for battered women's shelters. Is that correct?

Nicole Demers Bloc Laval, QC

Currently in Quebec—

10:50 a.m.

Conservative

Sylvie Boucher Conservative Beauport—Limoilou, QC

Does the money come from the federal government? That's what I want to know.

Nicole Demers Bloc Laval, QC

No. The Quebec government has made an addition, but not for battered Aboriginal women's shelters, which are under federal jurisdiction. Battered women's shelters are a provincial jurisdiction.

10:50 a.m.

Conservative

Sylvie Boucher Conservative Beauport—Limoilou, QC

The provincial government gives $300,000 to battered women's shelters.

Nicole Demers Bloc Laval, QC

Yes, it grants $300,000 for Quebec's battered women's shelters, not for Aboriginal women's shelters.

10:50 a.m.

Conservative

Sylvie Boucher Conservative Beauport—Limoilou, QC

All right, that's good. You've enlightened me.

The Chair Liberal Yasmin Ratansi

I have a technical question for you, Madame Demers. I will give it to you.

If we put in the words “the Minister of Indian Affairs” and you split the motion into two, then “the reinstatement of the criteria” is only for the Minister for the Status of Women. So that's where the next sentence would be put, because you can't have two ministers responsible for that.

Mr. Stanton, and then Ms. Minna.

10:50 a.m.

Conservative

Bruce Stanton Conservative Simcoe North, ON

I'm glad you raised the point.

If we were going to split the motion, I would suggest points one, two, and four could be in the first part. And point three in this proposed motion would be the second part; it would begin with the preamble in the motion as it was circulated. In other words, we go with the amended preamble for points one, two, and four, and the second motion, la deuxième partie, would be the existing preamble plus point three.

I say that principally because I don't see any difficulty with the points and including the changes that Madam Neville has suggested; these would be things we could probably support. Having said that, point three is objectionable, from our point of view.

The Chair Liberal Yasmin Ratansi

We need two motions.

Ms. Minna next.

Maria Minna Liberal Beaches—East York, ON

Two things, Madam Chair.

One, does Madame Demers want this reported to the House? I think this would obviously make sense.

The other is that Mr. Stanton just said number four would be put in with numbers one and two, but that doesn't work because it refers to criteria that follow point three, just referring to reinstating criteria for the Status of Women. So it really doesn't work to move it. By moving it, then you essentially are killing...so I think those two go together.

The Chair Liberal Yasmin Ratansi

The two together and the other two together...okay.

So can we vote on the modified motion, which reads that the Standing Committee on the Status of Women request the Minister for Status of Women and the Minister of Indian Affairs to...bullet one and bullet two--and report to the House.